Lampooning the Media

Cate Blanchett, Tyler Perry, Leonardo DiCaprio and Jennifer Lawrence in Don't Look Up.
Cate Blanchett, Tyler Perry, Leonardo DiCaprio and Jennifer Lawrence in Don’t Look Up. Photo: Niko Tavernise

I’ve not seen the satirical movie ‘Don’t Look Up‘, but on the strength of climate campaigner George Monbiot’s opening statement, I’ll rectify the omission! His column is another in GB’s Climate Change series, a series culled from reports, surveys and experts, material published in the public domain. The destruction of our planet is without doubt humankind’s greatest threat.


by George Monbiot

No wonder journalists have slated it. They’ve produced a hundred excuses not to watch the climate breakdown satire Don’t Look Up: it’s “blunt”, it’s “shrill”, it’s “smug”. But they will not name the real problem: it’s about them. The movie is, in my view, a powerful demolition of the grotesque failures of public life. And the sector whose failures are most brutally exposed is the media.

While the film is fast and funny, for me, as for many environmental activists and climate scientists, it seemed all too real. I felt as if I were watching my adult life flash past me. As the scientists in the film, trying to draw attention to the approach of a planet-killing comet, bashed their heads against the Great Wall of Denial erected by the media and sought to reach politicians with 10-second attention spans, all the anger and frustration and desperation I’ve felt over the years boiled over.

Above all, when the scientist who had discovered the comet was pushed to the bottom of the schedule by fatuous celebrity gossip on a morning TV show and erupted in fury, I was reminded of my own mortifying loss of control on Good Morning Britain in November. It was soon after the Cop26 climate conference in Glasgow, where we had seen the least serious of all governments (the UK was hosting the talks) failing to rise to the most serious of all issues. I tried, for the thousandth time, to explain what we are facing, and suddenly couldn’t hold it in any longer. I burst into tears on live TV.

I still feel deeply embarrassed about it. The response on social media, like the response to the scientist in the film, was vituperative and vicious. I was faking. I was hysterical. I was mentally ill. But, knowing where we are and what we face, seeing the indifference of those who wield power, seeing how our existential crisis has been marginalised in favour of trivia and frivolity, I now realise that there would be something wrong with me if I hadn’t lost it.

In fighting any great harm, in any age, we find ourselves confronting the same forces: distraction, denial and delusion. Those seeking to sound the alarm about the gathering collapse of our life-support systems soon hit the barrier that stands between us and the people we are trying to reach, a barrier called the media. With a few notable exceptions, the sector that should facilitate communication thwarts it.

It’s not just its individual stupidities that have become inexcusable, such as the platforms repeatedly given to climate deniers. It is the structural stupidity to which the media are committed. It’s the anti-intellectualism, the hostility to new ideas and aversion to complexity. It’s the absence of moral seriousness. It’s the vacuous gossip about celebrities and consumables that takes precedence over the survival of life on Earth. It’s the obsession with generating noise, regardless of signal. It’s the reflexive alignment with the status quo, whatever it may be. It’s the endless promotion of the views of the most selfish and antisocial people, and the exclusion of those who are trying to defend us from catastrophe, on the grounds that they are “worthy”, “extreme” or “mad” (I hear from friends in the BBC that these terms are still used there to describe environmental activists).

Even when these merchants of distraction do address the issue, they tend to shut out the experts and interview actors, singers and other celebs instead. The media’s obsession with actors vindicates Guy Debord’s predictions in his book The Society of the Spectacle, published in 1967. Substance is replaced by semblance, as even the most serious issues must now be articulated by people whose work involves adopting someone else’s persona and speaking someone else’s words. Then the same media, having turned them into spokespeople, attack these actors as hypocrites for leading a profligate lifestyle.

Similarly, it’s not just the individual failures by governments at Glasgow and elsewhere that have become inexcusable, but the entire framework of negotiations. As crucial Earth systems might be approaching their tipping point, governments still propose to address the issue with tiny increments of action, across decades.

It’s as if, in 2008, when Lehman Brothers collapsed and the global financial system began to sway, governments had announced that they would bail out the banks at the rate of a few million pounds a day between then and 2050. The system would have collapsed 40 years before their programme was complete. Our central, civilisational question, I believe, is this: why do nations scramble to rescue the banks but not the planet?

NOTE: George Monbiot is a Guardian columnist


This entry was posted in Climate Change, Media. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Lampooning the Media

  1. SoupCruncher says:

    I can’t watch Don’t Look Up all the way through, it’s too real! I feel like screaming at them, smashing the fucking TV!

  2. diabloandco says:

    Haven’t seen the film but I am with you all the way on the fatuous drivel lauded in the media – I try to avoid any programme with ‘celebrity ‘ in the title. I confess that I have caught a few celebrity quiz shows and what impresses me is the pride they take in their ignorance.

    P.S ,Grouse may I gently draw your attention to a missing ‘g’ in campaigner – it must be hell having so many proof readers!

  3. SoupCruncher says:

    “The pride they take in their ignorance” – in tears, sore laughing. Also spellchecked.

  4. tombkane says:

    I saw the film, was appalled by the critic-worthies, but then uplifted by the response from scientists and environmentalists.

    But George Monbiot’s article stood out. In the Guardian it ends with him saying he cries just about every day. We are a scabby society to have such a humane environmental activist working so hard, reporting so well and felling like that day after day.

    Another true hero…

  5. Michael W says:

    I keep horses on a small paddock and buy in hay/haylage/straw etc from local farmers and horse feed from the local farmers co-op.

    The farmers are best placed to say if the weather cycles are changing and they think they are.

    Things are changing rapidly: Its wetter, warmer, windier where we are and this has an impact on the well being of livestock with horses more and more prone locally to things such as laminitis, grass sickness, mud fever and so forth.

    i mention the farmers co-op not re the environmental issues that we face but the broad-faced evidence of price increases due to Brexit. Its costing us more for feed; the material for feed bags is unavailable etc.

  6. diabloandco says:

    Wheeeee! My day is sorted , I have my copy and the world will just have to wait!

    Thank you.

  7. Grouse Beater says:

    Good choice, sir, as waiters are apt to say. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s