Female Serial Killers

This article is a rare step away from this literary site’s concentration on Scottish culture and politics. Under the circumstances of recent harrowing events readers might wish to have some insight into the psyche of female serial killers.

As a sciptwriter of detective fiction, women killers who have taken up my time to reasearch are those abused by men for a long period, over and over again. I think immediately of Aileen Wurnos who shot dead seven of her male clients, eventually put on trial and executed. In fact, I have one script specialising in the male propensity for violence on women, a study in the types of males that drive women to murder, the ultimate device to silence their tormentors.

In Scotland we have one killer of children, but he was a man and his venure a school, not a hospital. Women killing babies is not an unknown event. It happens in prosperous White societies as well as primitive tribes. Killing many babies is an act, an aberration almost impossible to contemplate, but when it happens a terrible shock, how unsettling to our natural human instinct for caring. As can be read below, there have been examples in the past that show hospital bed carers are prone to morbid thoughts.

Nurse Lucy Letby’s drive to kill defenceless new-born is very hard to rationalise. One is left wondering if a piece of her brain is missing, the one that controls affection and empathy. Thoroughly disorientated by the happenings and repelled, it’s wise to turn to a trained phycologist for some understanding.

Dr Marissa Harrison is professor of psychology at Penn State Harrisburg, USA. She is the author of several scientific articles and a book on female serial killers. (See NOTES.) Was Lucy Letby an unlikely serial killer? To most people, yes – but not psychologists. She informs the process of engineering death is found in nurses above other vocations. Here is Dr Harrison’s diagnosis. 

The crimes of the convicted serial killer Lucy Letby have rattled the UK and the world. One can think of nothing worse: babies who were grievously ill, killed or injured by a woman who was meant to care for them. Why was Letby able to kill so many young victims? Why wasn’t she recognised as a murderer sooner?

Some are saying that Letby’s case is a “one-off”, and is thus difficult to process or learn from. While serial murder is rare, to those of us in the field of serial homicide research, the crimes and victims of Letby are less surprising. In many ways, Letby fits the profile for the “typical” female serial killer (FSK) that my team and I compiled for The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology in 2015. By analysing cases in the US, we found that nearly 40% of female serial killers are nurses, nurses’ aides or other healthcare workers.

Our analysis showed that a FSK is likely to be white, probably Christian, average looking or attractive, and in her 20s or 30s when the crimes start. She has an elevated probability of being a healthcare worker, often in charge of caring for those who are helpless. Those familiar to her are at risk, especially vulnerable people such as infants and the sick. She may murder for money or power. She may be arrogant or at times withdrawn, and may have experienced a recent relationship issue. Experts such as Eric Hickey and Patricia Pearson have also compiled information about FSK backgrounds, crimes, motives and victims.

The caveat is that a forensic profile is an imperfect predictor of future crimes, and the description above probably applies to many nurses you know. Moreover, almost every nurse or medical professional who has ever lived would never harm anyone. We created a composite FSK profile based on frequencies and trends in previous cases that we hoped would serve as a starting point – a statistical tool for investigating suspected female-perpetrated serial homicide offences.

In fairness, too, Letby did not check some of the boxes in our profile. Most FSKs have been married; Letby never was. Most FSKs do not keep souvenirs of their crimes; Letby kept bags of patient records and a diary with victim initials and their death dates. In our analysis we found a documented history of mental illness in about 40% of FSK cases. I have seen no reports yet that Letby has such a history. Many FSKs had parental issues. It is my understanding that Letby’s parents were supportive to the point of attending her trial every day. Yet the profile is a starting point for whom and what to look for when serial murder is suspected.

So how can we make sure that law enforcement and the public have access to what we know about FSKs as an investigative tool? My 2015 article about FSKs is reported to be the most-read article in the journal’s history. But the point is moot if the information isn’t disseminated to people who can use it. We can try to do better.

It does seem bewildering that administrators at Countess of Chester hospital failed to recognise Letby’s crimes after doctors raised concerns . Some outlets have put the hospital’s reaction down to a “a culture of arrogance”. As a research psychologist, however, I can offer a different perspective, and one that I offer to law enforcement when given the opportunity to engage with them.

We all have a “schema” – a cognitive framework – of how people, places and things typically operate to help us process the world around us. We create each schema from the slew of information we have encountered in our previous experiences. Evidence repeatedly shows that we find it very difficult to process or believe information that does not fit our schemas. We have a schema for “nurse”. A nurse is a skilled and compassionate caretaker. A nurse monitors, nourishes and soothes. “Killer” does not fit into our “nurse” schema.

More broadly, we also have a gender schema. Fairly or not, people have a preconceived notion of what we feel a “woman” and a “man” ought to be, based on our previous encounters and feedback. Evidence shows that, throughout history, women are typically perceived as nurturing, caring and kind. Most people are not ready to believe that a woman can kill.

Now think of “female nurse”, and how “murderer” is probably brushed off as being impossible.

The initial failures of the Countess of Chester hospital echoes what we have seen in previous FSK cases. Other hospital-based serial killers such as Kristen Gilbert, Reta Mays and Genene Jones killed multiple helpless victims before hospital authorities realised that the deaths were unnatural. When I give training talks to law enforcement (while acknowledging that their crime-solving skills are exponentially more developed than mine), I challenge them to drop their schemas. If you think a woman will not kill or a nurse will not kill, then think again.

On the heels of the Letby case, what can we do to stop this type of homicide, or at least to limit the number of future victims? As mentioned previously, we can become aware of the science out there, and perhaps we in the scientific community can do a better job of disseminating information. In addition, we can learn to look beyond our preconceived notions of who a murderer might be. One must be ready and willing to recognise that a crime is happening, even if the suspect seems unlikely based on our preconceived ideas.

Of Letby, Detective Ch Insp Nicola Evans said: “There isn’t anything outstanding or outrageous about her as a person.” This is reminiscent of the Mays case in West Virginia in the US, when District Judge Thomas Kleeh, sentencing Mays to life in prison for murdering seven elderly veterans under her hospital care, told her: “You are the monster no one sees coming.”

We must be prepared to recognise that, sometimes, the monster is a vanilla nurse who took dance lessons, fancied a staff doctor, and had teddy bears, fairy lights and a polka-dot dressing gown in her bedroom; an otherwise ordinary woman who took salsa lessons and a holiday with friends in Ibiza, and yet destroyed lives in a most extraordinary way.

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Female Serial Killers

  1. Robert McAllan says:

    Letby proved there is no template outwardly whereby she could have been deemed a risk to those entrusted to her care.

    Shockingly, avoidance of reputational damage to Countess of Chester hospital would appear to have been the driver when serious concerns brought by consultants to senior management regarding her presence in that unit were dismissed.

    Letby is the ‘monster’ to whom those in authority gave license and her evil deeds they chose to ignore. Do they hold it in their conscience?

  2. GM says:

    I thought the evidence against her was circumstantial. A lot of weight was given to expert opinion (we are not meant to question that). I suspect it was flannel. There is more here than meets the eye I think. Those were my impressions right or wrong.

  3. benmadigan says:

    the evidence against Lucy letby was circumstantial insofar as nobody actually saw her do any harm to the babies and there were no CC cameras in the wards. Nevertheless AFAIK she was the only person on duty in the wards every time the children collapsed and sometimes died

  4. lorncal says:

    I think one doctor, at one point, saw the other nurse come out of the unit, leaving Letby alone, and he was immediately alerted since he already suspected her. According to his evidence, when he entered the unit to check, she was standing over a child’s cot while it was struggling for oxygen to live and she was doing nothing to summon help or try to help the baby herself. The doctor had been writing up records just outside the unit, and easily summoned. The doctor checked the tube and found that something was wrong and fixed the problem. He went to the hospital management who refused to do anything. Yes, everything was circumstantial, but she could have been asked quietly to take paid leave while a proper inquiry was held by the hospital authorities, potentially saving more babies’ lives, or, alternatively, clearing her if no impropriety was discovered.

  5. Grouse Beater says:

    Yes, that, the ward rota record of her being the only nurse there at all baby deaths, and her journal kept at home. “I did it. I am evil!”

  6. Howard Cairns says:

    Interesting.

Leave a comment