A Clear and Present Danger

1703

Dr Kennette Benedict, executive director of the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, shows off the new abstract Doomsday Clock

The phrase ‘clear and present danger’ has a profound reverberation far graver than any political automaton of western imperialism will ever admit. To Atomic scientists it means mass extinction.

The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists (BAS) has a famous doomsday clock. It was established in 1947. As wars break out in various parts of the globe, or a country trades secrets of how to make a nuclear bomb, or a nation’s leader shifts weapons of mass destruction to the border of another nation, the clock’s hands are advanced towards midnight the threat of a nuclear holocaust being all too obvious.

In the past it was turned back when the threat of nuclear war receded. The hands were turned back when the Berlin Wall  was toppled. The USSR’s President Gorbachev offered then promised to remove the wall on the understanding the west would not deploy nuclear missiles close to its borders.

The phrase he used was, ‘NATO would not advance one inch to the east.’ It was repeated in dispatches and diplomatic documents. He told President Reagan if that was agreed he was happy to let East and West German unite again – a remarkable, in fact, astonishing offer. Later, Reagan, a wily ‘B’ picture actor, on a visit to West Berlin, called on Russia in a famous speech to ‘take down that wall’ knowing full-well it was already a done deal, thus stealing the credit for himself, and western history books.

Accidents will happen

The clock is closest to doomsday since the early 1980s when there was a major war scare. That was when medium range Pershing ballistic missiles were deployed in western Europe pointing at the USSR. President Clinton had promised Gorbachev he would move missiles away from the Russian border, and then reneged on the promise. It was a verbal promise, admittedly, but how can you trust a nation that promises one thing and then does the opposite?

The hands of the clock were moved back from midnight, way back, when the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty was signed and the old USSR dissolved. The grim right-wing dumbass President Dubelya Bush reversed all that optimism at the start of the millennium to show his dad he really was the tough son he could be proud of. His brother, Jeb Bush, a presidential candidate, follows assiduously in his family’s fateful footsteps.

The hands are back again close to midnight. One of the reasons is the deterioration in Russia-US relations, which is quite threatening. Nation after nation cranks up the rhetoric in imitation of the USA’s warmongering drumbeat. The other issue is environmental catastrophe, which wasn’t a problem the world understood back in the Eighties.

Whichever country the USA takes a dislike to this week is the new world threat. The international community follows suit. But no one seems to know exactly which countries make up the illusory ‘international community’ warmongering leaders keep referring to as on the side of democracy. It’s a phrase straight out of Orwell’s novel, 1984.

Who decides world order?

Threats to world order are, in short order, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Syria, and at the time of writing, we are back with Russia again, our right-wing  horsemen determined to rekindle the Cold War. It’s a wonder Scotland is not in there since its ambition to kick Trident out of its backyard has us classified as a pariah state by English politicians.

There is no concrete evidence Iran is, or has been, preparing uranium to create a nuclear arsenal, but there is all the evidence we need in speeches and written records that Iran is fearful of Israel’s aggression, and the knowledge Israel has its own nuclear bomb, yet refuses to sign any proliferation treaty. Recent negotiations between the USA and Iran to allow inspections of nuclear power plants in Iran lessens that anxiety a little … until the USA decides it is in its interest to cry wolf again.

This brings me to NATO. After the break-up of the Soviet Union there was no role, some said, no reason for the existence of NATO. NATO was supposed to protect Western Europe from the Russian killer hordes; people older than me will remember the ‘the commies are coming’ scares, reiterated in countless British newspapers, and symbolised in that 1956 black and white Hollywood movie about alien pods taking over people’s personalities, ‘The Invasion of the Body Snatchers.’

Where stands NATO now?

With the threat gone of hordes of Russian Cossacks on horseback galloping down Whitehall towards Number 10 Downing Street and on to Buckingham Palace, what happens to NATO? That was the moment Gorbachev, (whom I regard as the hero of the twentieth century) made that astonishing proposal. He offered to let Germany be unified and to join NATO, a hostile military alliance. NATO immediately advanced to the Russian border. Gorbachev was furious and disillusioned.

And where are we now? The Ukraine has happened now. The answer is to neutralise it. Incorporating it into NATO is a serious threat to Russia. No? Russia still the ‘Evil Empire’? President Putin knows his history.

Reverse the situation; try to imagine how the USA would react if a country planted nuclear weapons along its border – well, we don’t need to imagine it. The USA under President Kennedy brought the world to the brink of catastrophe when Cuba accepted Russian rockets having been the subject of countless military attacks from the USA to destabilise it, and to assassinate President Fidel Castro. (Amazingly he has outlived all his adversaries!)

Today ISIS in Syria is the latest ‘threat’ and the USA conducting wars by drones without any approval of the United Nations. But there is no international mechanism to restrain powerful nations. As President Obama keeps saying over Iran and any other state that irks America or threatens its interests ‘all options are open.’

The MAD hypothesis – mutual assured destruction.

The insanity of assuming whoever has one man standing is the winner.

The Doomsday Clock has been placed several minutes before “midnight” again – three minutes to midnight. Midnight means the human race, humankind, is done, finished, wiped out. That includes the flora and fauna that has done nothing to deserve extinction.

Warmongering politicians are the clear and present danger. They should be removed from power immediately. Their authority should be taken from them. So should we remove from office politicians who cast their fellow citizens as insurgents.

It is simplifying matters to assert John Major is an idiot likening Scotland’s democratic ambitions to nuclear annihilation, a ‘clear and present danger’. In reality it is much more complex. He tells us democracy has its limits.

In his case the British state cannot, will not, deal with change. It will resist change with all the weapons at its disposal. Scotland must be taught to remain subservient to England’s domestic and foreign policies.

We can stop spending billions on weapons of mass destruction and furnish the hospitals we keep complaining are underfunded, or even wipe out food banks.

Only those with a death wish will toss that opportunity away. 

(This is an introduction to ‘The Folly of Nuclear War’. Click on – http://wp.me/p4fd9j-8jc )

Advertisements
This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to A Clear and Present Danger

  1. diabloandco says:

    Yep! I think you have that covered , though I believe ” regime change” may be in the offing for Scotland via Westminster /Washington.
    I never thought I would come to loathe Washington and its activities – but I do.
    The American people on the other hand have shown themselves to be a generous , kindly bunch.
    Goodness knows why they vote for the warmongering politicians of Tweedledum and Tweedledee – do they not realise that by that association there are those in the world who hate them ?

    • Grouse Beater says:

      The American people on the other hand have shown themselves to be a generous , kindly bunch.

      I certainly agree with that sentiment.

    • The American people on the other hand have shown themselves to be a generous , kindly bunch.
      Goodness knows why they vote for the warmongering politicians of Tweedledum and Tweedledee
      Having lived in the Southern states for 7 years I agree 100% on the generosity and kindness of the people. As for the reason they vote for warmongering politicians? Same reason we do here. You think the MSM/BBC control the discourse here, try living in the USA. The people are captive without knowing it. I didn’t understand how bad it was until I came back home and realized how much I had been influenced by 7 years of Fox/NRA/clear and present danger BS. It was like waking from a bad dream. I was left shaking my head and wondering WTF nearly happened to me there? I have had a deep deep suspicion of everything I read and listen to in MSM ever since. The recent referendum and current election campaign has reinforced my belief that the true “real and present danger” are those that control the mainstream media. Our ability to converse on the internet is the antidote and one powerful one it is.

  2. Justin Fayre says:

    WOW..Inspired and inspirationable..(if there’s such a word).
    Should be printed off, copied, laminated abd displayed in all public places.
    In an age where common sense, decency, dignity and social justice are mocked and ridiculed, someone finally has the courage to tell it as it is.
    The two hands of USA
    On the one hand you have good old Uncle Sam:- generous, kind if a little loud and brash. On the other:- the school bully. Be in my gang and bask in my protection or be excluded and suffer the consequences
    Well done you

    • Frankly, if Uncle Sam wants to force regime change on the Scottish people he’d best be prepared to invest in some new plots at Arlington.
      I’d like to say though, my opinion of the American people themselves reflects the opinions stated previously. The NeoCons however, are a stain on the history of humanity as much as the British Empire, Hitler, Stalin, Amin or Pol Pot.

  3. Connor Mcewen says:

    Just on to plug;WWW Stopthewar coalition.Similar sentiments as yours

  4. Fran says:

    The West is the main aggressor of nuclear threats, its what keeps America where it is. Russia believes that the West is mad enough to “push the button”. As the American General said,” we fought ww1 in Europe, we fought ww11 in Europe and we will fight ww111 in Europe”. Maybe its their turn to host the big event.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s