Capitalists Behind GRA Ideology

Philanthropist Jennifer Pritzker, at left, and Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker. Photo: Vince Talotta

The goggle-eyed madmen of the type that populate James Bond films planning grandiose schemes of obtaining ultimate power and wealth over the planet are long known to be behind the ugly faux ideology of GRA reform. “We are making God as we are implementing technology that is ever more all-knowing, ever-present, all-powerful, and beneficent,” said one oily madman.

Of course, none of this massive hoax on unthinking, compliant institutions and sponge-brained citizens would have originated in America, aided and abetted by the odious Stonewall outfit now in hard pursuit of a share of the loot GRA reform is creating.

Where else? One answer to the spread of evangelical evil must be for governments to block the creation of university departments and institutions devoted to deviant human biology bought by private money, but that would need precise definitions to become safe law. The other way is to stop individuals becoming so rich that they have excess funds they can use to play with the future of humankind as they wish – let’s call it severe taxation.

Left unchallenged by law, we can expect the GRA flat earth doctrine to remain part of American life for some time to come. Scotland could outlaw it in a week, but our nationalist government has been funding Stonewall Scotland in what has to constitute corruption at some legal level. After all, the outfit is fast removing women’s rights and appears not to give a proverbial lump of excreta about the chaos and unhappiness they are causing. Readers should keep in mind that our first minister has attached her legacy to the guff promoted as GRA reform.

The investigative journalist Jennifer Bilek has the skinny on one family of new-age shape-shifters, Pritskers, billionaires whose money came from the Hyatt chain of hotels. Here is her latest research, slightly abridged. As she puts it, “the wealthy, powerful, and very weird Pritzker cousins have set their sights on a new God-like goal: using gender ideology to remake human biology.

If any reader feels bombarded and confused by GRA reform arguments, and I do not blame them, it can be summed up in a phrase; ‘erasing women’. There are signs of a backlash to this capitalist mind control, but women need the support of men to stop it and reverse it.


by Jennifer Bilek

One of the most powerful yet unremarked-upon drivers of our current wars over definitions of gender is a concerted push by members of one of the richest families in the United States to transition Americans from a dimorphic definition of sex to the broad acceptance and propagation of synthetic sex identities (SSI). Over the past decade, the Pritzkers of Illinois, who helped put Barack Obama in the White House and include among their number former U.S. Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker, current Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker, and philanthropist Jennifer Pritzker, appear to have used a family philanthropic apparatus to drive an ideology and practice of disembodiment into our medical, legal, cultural, and educational institutions.

I first wrote about the Pritzkers, whose fortune originated in the Hyatt hotel chain, and their philanthropy directed toward normalizing what people call “transgenderism” in 2018. I have since stopped using the word “transgenderism” as it has no clear boundaries, which makes it useless for communication, and have instead opted for the term SSI, which more clearly defines what some of the Pritzker’s and their allies are funding—even as it ignores the biological reality of “male” and “female” and “gay” and “straight.”

The creation and normalization of SSI speaks much more directly to what is happening in American culture, and elsewhere, under an umbrella of human rights. With the introduction of SSI, the current incarnation of the LGBTQ+ network—as distinct from the prior movement that fought for equal rights for gay and lesbian Americans, and which ended in 2020 with Bostock v. Clayton County, finding that LGBTQ+ is a protected class for discrimination purposes—is working closely with the techno-medical complex, big banks, international law firms, pharma giants, and corporate power to solidify the idea that humans are not a sexually dimorphic species—which contradicts reality.

Conjuring sex identity

Through investments in the techno-medical complex, where new highly medicalized sex identities are being conjured, Pritzkers and other elite donors are attempting to normalize the idea that human reproductive sex exists on a spectrum. These investments go toward creating new SSI using surgeries and drugs, and by instituting rapid language reforms to prop up these new identities and induce institutions and individuals to normalize them.

In 2018, for example, at the Ronald Reagan Medical Centre at the University of California Los Angeles (where the Pritzkers are major donors and hold various titles), the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology advertised several options for young females who think they can be men to have their reproductive organs removed, a procedure termed “gender-affirming care.”

A personal medical school

The Pritzkers became the first American family to have a medical school bear its name in recognition of a private donation when it gave $12 million to the University of Chicago School of Medicine in 1968. In June 2002, the family announced an additional gift of $30 million to be invested in the University of Chicago’s Biological Sciences Division and School of Medicine. These investments provided the family with a bridgehead into the world of academic medicine, which it has since expanded in pursuit of a well-defined agenda centered around SSI. Also in 2002, Jennifer Pritzker founded the Tawani Foundation, which has since provided funding to Howard Brown Health and Rush Memorial Medical Center in Chicago, the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Foundation Fund, and the University of Minnesota’s Institute for Sexual and Gender Health, all of which provide some version of “gender care.” In the case of the latter, “clients” include “gender creative children as well as transgender and gender non-conforming adolescents …”

In 2012, J.B. Pritzker and his wife, M.K. Pritzker, worked with The Bridgespan Group—a management consultant to nonprofits and philanthropists—to develop a long-term strategy for the J.B and M.K. Pritzker Family Foundation. Their work together included conducting research on developments in the field of early childhood education, to which the foundation committed $25 million. Ever since, a motivating and driving force behind the Pritzkers’ familywide commitment to SSI has been J.B.’s cousin Jennifer (born James) Pritzker—a retired lieutenant colonel in the Illinois Army National Guard and the father of three children.

Transitioning to womanhood

In 2013, around the time gender ideology reached the level of mainstream American culture, Jennifer Pritzker announced a transition to womanhood. Since then, Pritzker has used the Tawani Foundation to help fund various institutions that support the concept of a spectrum of human sexes, including the Human Rights Campaign Foundation, the Williams Institute UCLA School of Law, the National Centre for Transgender Equality, the Transgender Legal Defence and Education Fund, the American Civil Liberties Union, the Palm Military Centrer, the World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH), and many others. It is hard to avoid the impression of complementarity between Jennifer Pritzker’s for-profit medical investments and philanthropic support for SSI.

Pritzker also helps fund the University of Minnesota National Centre for Gender Spectrum Health, which claims “the gender spectrum is inclusive of the wide array of gender identities beyond binary definitions of gender—inclusive of cisgender and transgender identities, gender queer, and nonbinary identities as a normal part of the natural expression of gender.

Pritzker’s philanthropy is also active in Canada, where Jennifer has helped fund the University of Toronto’s Bonham Centre for Sexual Diversity Studies, a teaching institution invested in the deconstruction of human sex. An instructor in the Bonham Centre and the curator of its Sexual Representation Collection—“Canada’s largest archival collection of pornography”—is transgender studies professor Nicholas Matte, who denies categorically that sexual dimorphism exists. Rothblatt is an integral presence at Out Leadership, a business networking arm of the LGBTQ+ movement, and appears to believe that “we are making God as we are implementing technology that is ever more all-knowing, ever-present, all-powerful, and beneficent.” At least two clinics in California are now providing nonbinary surgeries and nullification surgeries for individuals who feel both male and female, or like neither.

The Gender Mapping Project estimates that there are now thousands of similar “gender clinics” around the world, and over 400 that offer to medically manipulate the sex of children.

The connection list is endless

Jeanne Pritzker, married to J.B.’s brother Anthony, who is Jennifer’s cousin, is a training psychologist at UCLA where she and her husband established the Anthony and Jeanne Pritzker Family Scholarship to support medical students at UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine. Mrs. Pritzker is a member of the Board of Visitors at the Geffen School, which is affiliated with a children’s hospital named after Mattel—the multinational toy company that debuted a “transgender Barbie” recently made in the likeness of the actor Laverne Cox.

In August 2021, Gov. Pritzker signed into law a new sex education bill for all public schools in Illinois, the first of its kind designed in accordance with the second edition of the National Sex Education Standards (NSES) to update sex ed curricula in K-12 schools. Bill SB0 818 will be implemented on or before Aug. 1, 2022. Though the bill includes a written opt-out for parents (but not an alternative if they do opt-out), many are concerned with the material being brought into children’s schools under the auspices of teaching them sexual health—namely gender identity ideology and other related material.

Critics of the NSES standards created by the FoSE collaborative and now being implemented in Illinois under Gov. Pritzker may have concerns about a 72-page manual in which the term “anal sex” comes up 10 times and the word “intimacy” only half as often. The word “gender,” for what it’s worth, is used 270 times.

Erasing women

While many Americans are still trying to understand why women are being erased in language and law, and why children are being taught they can choose their sex, the Pritzker cousins and others may be well on their way to engineering a new way to be human.

But what could possibly explain the abrupt drive of wealthy elites to deconstruct who and what we are and to manipulate children’s sex characteristics in clinics now spanning the globe while claiming new rights for those being deconstructed? Perhaps it is profit. Perhaps it is the pleasure of seeing one’s own personal obsessions writ large. Perhaps it is the human temptation to play God. No matter what the answer is, it seems clear that SSI will be an enduring part of America’s future.

NOTE: Jennifer Bilek is an investigative journalist living in New York City. Link: The 11th Hour Blog.


This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Capitalists Behind GRA Ideology

  1. duncanio says:

    Lots of people wonder why did GRA has gained traction in Scotland. I am no expert on the subject but from my reading of the situation some of the main factors are:

    Virtue Signalers – well meaning but naive types (mostly women) who want to “be kind”.
    Powerful politicians – Nicola Sturgeon’s core base is the trans activists within her own party.
    Influential Agencies – Stonewall, in need of a new raison d’etre – seems to be the main one here.

    But it would seem that, as ever, the biggest driving force can be found in you “follow the money”.

  2. Grouse Beater says:

    I think you have it about right. We assume trans rights a relatively new political phenomenon but it has taken a good few years to become an international controversy issuing from its original US source. Exactly why Sturgeon latched onto it above all that was important and critical, to the point it diverted us from Indy, lies deep in her psychopathy.

  3. lorncal says:

    Let’s be fair, GB, those two are perfect models for why abortion should be retained. Oh, yes, it has everything to do with power, wealth, influence and profit. We mustn’t forget narcissistic psychopathy. Imagine if we could identify (pun intended) these mad, wealthy people in the womb when they are just scraps of DNA, we might all be tempted to play God! Jeez, does that chap actually believe he looks like a woman? He looks barely human! If that is what having squillions does for you, I’ll remain poor.

  4. It’s hard to find more compelling evidence for a programme of ‘De-Americanisation’ in an independent Scotland.
    That said, the USA, like the EU will likely not exist in its current form in two years’ time.

  5. tombkane says:

    This is all a bit fright-night writ large. This may seem a bit of a diversion…

    There is a new TV series from Hulu that is on Disney-plus that stars and is produced by Michael Keaton… Called Dopesick. I highly, highly recommend it. It’s based on the best-selling book by Beth Macy.

    The central theme is how Purdue Pharma and the Sackler family business (big power and big wealth) were instrumental in pushing opioids onto poor people right across America – claiming the drug wasn’t addictive, while knowing it was; brazenly chasing the dollar, disregarding the crime statistics and playing with Universities, The Arts, Research and media in their strategic determinations. And how hard prosecutors had to work to bring justice to the victims.

    The leader of the house of Sackler is played in a particularly emotionless manner, that seemed right to me. It’s not just that these people accept cognitive dissonance, they engineer societal breaks with it so as to mine profits.

    Where we are going with gender and medical partnerships is potentially to a worse place. Oxycontin – the narcotic Purdue Pharma pushed so hard – didn’t make it to Europe, and so it’s reach stopped. The gender doctrines have already traveled the world. The groundwork is already done.

    Very strangely I am positive though. It really was not easy. But people eventually saw through it… Though nobody went to prison for it.

    If, as Alex Salmond suggests, we have a convention to shape our independence pathway … We need to talk about a constitution that is fair to all people and one that is fairly policed and evolved.

    I highly recommend Dopesick. So challenging and moving.

  6. lorncal says:

    A bit off-centre, GB, but it is something that has struck me several times and I’ve been worrying about it. Anyone who has been keeping up with the news from Afghanistan will have seen the crowds of the poorest on the planet, in the wake of the earthquakes, scrambling to get food and water from aid workers. It is a heartrending sight. One thing that is never mentioned though, is the fact that no females whatsoever are ever seen. No female hands are outstretched for desperately needed food and water.

    Of course, they might rely on husbands, fathers, sons, nephews, etc. to fetch their share, but, a) how do we know they get a share at all; and what happens if a woman has no male children or a husband alive or male relatives? Do they simply die of starvation and thirst, having been spared the death of suffocation or crushing by the results of the earthquake? The vast and seemingly never-ending deliberate cruelty to female persons right across the globe far outweighs any conflict, pandemic or any other major disaster.

    You couldn’t even call it a crime against humanity because it is so massive, so immense and so deliberate that you have no chance of getting your head round it. What do women do to so many men that they need to kill, rape, sexually assault, starve, beat, threaten us and generally make our lives so miserable that for very many it can hardly be worth living? We might preen and tell ourselves that we are more civilized, but are we really when what is happening here is just a reflection of what is happening and what has always been happening to women the world over in every era. Why do so many men hate female people so thoroughly?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s