Scotland in the 21st Century: 5

In his fifth paper from his book, ‘Doun-Hauden: The Socio-Political Determinants of Scottish Independence’Professor Alfred Baird discusses nationalism. I have lost count of the number of times English nationalists have accused Scots of ‘vile nationalism’. My reply is usually encapsulated in the short phrase, ‘there is good nationalism and there is bad nationalism. Forced to expand on this I add, ‘Scotland is small country nationalism, encouraging pride of place, England is big country nationalism steeped in imperialism’.

Scotland has no ambition to invade another country, at least, I do not recall electing a party with invasion plans, not even against Orkney’s oft announced comic warning to secede! I cannot think we want to dominate other nations economically or culturally. Putting our own in order is challenge enough.

For the most part we regret we are not in charge of our regiments anymore. We cannot stop them helping England wage unjust wars in the Middle East. We have no wish to exploit cheap Chinese labour and then tell them how to run their country. Nor will we tell Chagos Islanders the UN’s decision in their favour is only words, the UN sucks. Chagonians will not get promised reparation or their land back. And in bizarre contrary fashion, after refusing people cheated of their birthright, follow the insult with billboard trucks running around cities stating foreign nationals should go home, or else!

Scotland’s nationalism is at base, the age-old struggle to achieve full civil and constitutional rights. Press pundits and politicians deriding that wish are expressing anti-democratic opinion, paid to do it, more’s the pity. Had England been a generous neighbour, they might have offered us an equitable relationship last century while asking us to remain in a new model of partnership that is not one of daylight robbery.

But Westminster saw oil, lots of it, and trillions in profits. It was a rerun of Churchill and Persia’s oil. So they stole it, squandered it on debasing trade unions, and then pretended they had taken it all, oil wells were dry. In return Scotland got a hobbled parliament with three parties dedicated to maintaining the status quo, a one-way ‘Union’ of unequals.

Control is everything, and everything must be controlled. That is the hallmark of big country nationalism. Gandhi put it succinctly – “Violent nationalism, otherwise known as imperialism, is a curse”.

England is a cursed nation, trapped by its delusional belief in its magnificence and power. England is busy removing itself from the world, Scotland desperate to rejoin it.

The current tenor of the Tory party is one of encouraging xenophobia and trampling over individial rights, and the laws of other nations. The world has changed since Victoria Regina squatted on her throne paid by the wealth of India, patronising her Scottish ghillie John Brown on her visits to Balmoral, awarding him the cringeworthy title applicable to Scotland, ‘Queen’s Highland Servant’. Scotland’s nationalism does not wish to belittle individuals or harm other nations.

I argue: ‘Better a friendly Scotland self-reliant than an angry one coerced’.


There are different forms and definitions of nationalism depending on the specific objectives of the national entities and peoples concerned. Nationalism in its simplest sense implies that a nation’s people should be free to govern themselves, which is effectively what Self-determination nationalism is. 

Trans-national nationalism, on the other hand, is quite different given this involves one country extending its sphere of influence and control over other, usually neighbouring,countries. 

Trans-national nationalism is invariably undertaken aggressively and provokes conflict, which in turn leads to demands from oppressed peoples for independence and hence Self-determination nationalism.

Trans-national nationalism involves the occupation by one country of other countries and assuming control over these territories and peoples. Self-determination (or Decolonisation) nationalism, in contrast, relates primarily to the Self-determination and self-government of a single nation and its people. The latter does not involve occupation of neighbouring countries, nor does it lead to their economic exploitation, neither does it involve enforced cultural and linguistic (Imperialism) measures imposed on other peoples’, the latter a common feature of Trans-national nationalism. Within the UK ‘union’, Scotland demonstrates many of the features, and therefore retains a legacy of being subjected to Trans-national nationalism.  

Servant of twa maisters

Ongoing cultural assimilation has resulted in some Scots developing what Professor Tom Devine termed a ‘dual identity’; this means many Scots live with ‘a complex mix of Scottish and Britishness’ in terms of their national identity. Post Indyref14 research suggests that the constitutional question on Scottish independence is really a question of these two competing identities, which is an outcome reflecting the influence of Trans-National nationalism. This is a consequence of a different (i.e. English / Anglophone) culture and language having been imposed on the Scottish people via Trans-national nationalism, a people who at the same time are deprived of learning and hence respecting and valuing their own (Scots) language. 

The policy of cultural assimilation in Trans-national nationalism is combined with economic exploitation, and occupation, the latter in large part creating and constantly reinforcing an Anglophone meritocracy and hence an Anglophone cultural hegemony in Scotland. Taken together, all of these aspects involving socio-political control and economic exploitation over a people and territory reflect key objectives of Trans-national nationalism.

Oppressed peoples, according to Frantz Fanon, must therefore ‘fight for the survival of their national culture’, the basis of which is their language, which in turn means a fight for the liberation and freedom of the nation itself. National culture lies ‘at the very heart of the struggle for freedom’ and provides the motivation for Self-determination / Decolonisation nationalism and hence independence from an oppressor that is enforcing control and exploitation via policies and practices that reflect Trans-national nationalism.

British nationalism in Northern Ireland

Research in Northern Ireland established that unionism there is viewed as a form of British nationalism (Pettigrew 2016). In this context unionism is considered to be an ideological nationalism, and with that comes what is described as a ‘culturally-intertwined political identity’. In Northern Ireland, unionists are deemed to hold an innate emotional attachment to Britain, and thus approach any constitutional question ‘through the prism of identity rather than via any monetary lens’. Given the data on voting outcomes in indyref14, it may be hypothesized that unionism and its influence on national identity is not so very much different in Scotland when it comes to important constitutional matters such as Scottish-independence.

Indigenous peoples seeking national self-determination tend to share a common identity which naturally is culturally and linguistically determined, as reflecting the criteria and definition of ‘a people’, according to the UN/ICJ, which includes factors such as their; traditions and culture, ethnicity, history and heritage, language, religion, sense of identity or kinship, the will to constitute a people, and common suffering. However, those opposed to independence may instead reflect other more dominant external cultural and linguistic influences which help determine or even alter their national identity, which is one of the objectives of Trans-national nationalism (and Colonialism).

A national consciousness

Frantz Fanon noted that it is a peoples’ culture which best represents the expression of their national consciousness, because our national consciousness ‘is the most elaborate form of culture’. Fanon also made the point that: ‘national consciousness, which is not nationalism, is the only thing that will give us an international dimension’; a people subjected to Trans-national nationalism are, by implication, prevented from enjoying or benefitting from an ‘international dimension’ to a large extent. Here the socio-economic interests of the colonise rare furthered by diminishing and demeaning the notion or extent of national consciousness in the minds of the colonised people, which is in large part achieved through marginalising and subordinating their culture and killing off their language (i.e. linguicide), much as has occurred with a Scottish people still today subjected to domination through British/English Trans-national nationalism.

Trans-national nationalism and its oppressions therefore involve a degree of British/English xenophobia as applying to Scotland, the latter reflecting prejudice – by the British Anglophone ruling hegemony – against Scottish culture and with that the Scots language, Scottish identity and Scottish aspirations for self-government and Self-determination (i.e.independence), all of which Trans-national nationalism seeks to suppress. This represents the reaction of (British/English) Trans-national nationalism which depends on Cultural and Linguistic Imperialism measures to maintain an Anglophone ruling hegemony that views Scotland as ‘its’ territory (or colony) and considers Scottish independence as ‘separation’, rather than a sovereign Scottish people merely withdrawing from a dubious treaty-based alliance UK ‘union’.

Civic nationalism’, which is all too often stressed by the SNP Scottish Government, is defined as an association of people from different nations and identities who identify themselves as ‘belonging to a nation’Civic nationalism may sound positive in theory, however, Self-determination stands to be thwarted when those granted national voting rights do not share the same desire for a given national identity or in holding its citizenship, as the ‘people’ seeking Self-determination and independence.

Self-determination clearly stands the risk of failing for a nation and people where, for instance due to demographic change, a significant portion of the voting population has limited or no innate desire for a Scottish identity, or hold a sense of ‘belonging’ to the nation and ‘people’ seeking Self-determination. Post Indyref14 research (Bond 2015) reflects this in the finding that: ‘Many of those who contributed to the decision on Scotland’s constitutional future in 2014 would not understand themselves as subjectively Scottish at all’. Securing national independence first therefore seems an essential pre-requisite before Civic-nationalism ideals may reasonably be implemented.


The stated raison d’être of Britain’s/England’s governing Tories is to create a ‘one-nation’ Britain within what is evidently now little more than the guise of a ‘union’. This objective essentially confirms the prevailing British political ideology as Trans-national nationalism which constitutes a nationalist political ideology, despite being referred to as ‘unionism’.

Trans-national nationalism is by its nature an aggressive form of nationalism given it involves occupation, exploitation, coercion and control by a dominant core country together with the imposition of its culture, values and language on other nations and peoples, as well as the installation of a meritocratic elite and cultural hegemony that reflects and represents the interests of the dominant entity. 

Trans-national nationalism is clearly an oppressive political ideology imposed upon other nations and peoples with the intent to subjugate and exploit them. 

British Trans-national nationalism therefore involves exploitation and oppression of Scotland and its people. Conversely, Scottish independence and Self-determination nationalism have nothing whatever to do with occupation of neighbouring countries, nor does this form of nationalism involve enforcement of (Scottish) cultural and linguistic imperialism measures, or the economic exploitation and political oppression of other peoples. Trans-national nationalism, on the other hand, requires and demands all of these oppressive acts in varying measures – occupation, economic exploitation, cultural and linguistic imperialism, and external political control (Hochman 2015).

Nationalism as colonialism

Trans-national nationalism is effectively Colonialism, which the UN maintains is a ‘scourge’and should be ended. The desire of Scotland’s people in seeking Self-determination and the pursuit of independence, which may also be described as Anti-colonial nationalism, is a reaction to the oppressions brought about through Trans-national nationalism. Scotland’s quest for independence is therefore Self-determination or Anti-colonial nationalism which is a valid and indeed a typical and well-understood response of any people subjected to the ‘scourge’ of Colonialism and Trans-national nationalism.

Self-determination for the Scottish people is primarily about their liberation from British/English Trans-national nationalist exploitation, oppression and subjugation and hence it is about their Decolonisation. This rightful objective must remain paramount for Scotland’s people, and should not be subject to external interference by any other peoples, as stated in the UN Charter.



The aim of these articles – published by kind permission of ‘Yours for Scotland’ website – is to help broaden the case for independence, and also to give the curious and the already convinced information generally denied them by the agencies of the British state, the same trying to sell ‘Britishness’ as they once tried to sell ‘Buy British’.

Article 1 on Culture can be found here:

Article 2 on Language can be found here:

Article 3 on Demographics can be found here:

Article 4 on Colonialism can be found here:

Grouse Beater – Colonialism is Crime:

Grouse Beater – England’s Neo-Colonialism:

Grouse Beater – The Republic of Barbados:

BOOK: ‘Doun-Hauden: The Socio-Political Determinants of Scottish Independence’, available from

This entry was posted in Scottish Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Scotland in the 21st Century: 5

  1. lorncal says:

    “… I argue: ‘Better a friendly Scotland self-reliant than an angry one coerced… “’

    I think we are fast approaching that point, Alf, when we really have had enough. As a woman, I know that I have reached the end of my tether, I’m raging and I have no facility left for ‘just be kind’. In the same way, I no longer have any sympathy or empathy left for the “you’re a blood and soil nationalist” brigade.

    All nationalisms are blood and soil since they constitute the desire to have your blood and your soil recognized as being yours, firstly, then as being worthy of independence. I would suggest that the majority of rUK people who voted NO in 2014 were so used to thinking of England, not only as top dog in the UK, but, essentially, AS the UK, as acting independently of, and taking the decisions for, the other three parts of the UK, that they never even questioned their arrogant assumption that they had the right to thwart Scotland’s independence.

    I do believe that this is just beginning to penetrate their carapace, and some of them, at least, are at last getting some glimmer of understanding that what they did in 2014 was outrageously selfish and arrogantly colonialist. Whether that will change minds remains to be seen, of course. One thing that I am sure of is that a new and different approach to the constitutional question is also beginning to penetrate. More and more are starting to understand that another pre independence referendum is not just unnecessary, but would be supremely stupid.

    A hard-nosed attitude is starting to coalesce around how we regain our independence, and a whole new debate is opening up. Personally, I have no patience with those who have ether been in Scotland since 2007 when an independent Scotland became achievable and who have ignored that, or for those – the Vichy Scots – who collaborate and disable their own country and all those less fortunate than themselves by their stupidly detrimental actions. Just as a kind of retribution was meted out to the real Vichy collaborators who caused so much misery for their own people, their Scottish counterparts need to rethink their whole attitude to Scottish independence, too, before it is too late.

    You can repudiate independence because you are afraid of the consequences for yourself, but collaboration is a step further than that, and harms others when the end is inescapable, anyway, one way or another.

  2. alfbaird says:

    Lorncal, thanks for that. It will certainly be interesting watching the different ‘actors’ reaction as the penny finally begins to drop, as it surely must, on Scotland’s imperial subjugation, which far too many people, as was the case in Ireland, still comprehend as an aberration within the British dominions, despite the facts revealing otherwise.

  3. diabloandco says:

    Thank you both for the article and the comment – I too am beyond enraged.

    I no longer wish ‘to be kind’ which translates as ‘doormat’ in my interpretation.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s