Harvesting Scotland

How the Highlands and Lowlands were exploited to make rich men richer and Scotland subservient


It is remarkable how land described as impoverished and infertile happens to hold vast riches for the few when it is freed of the many who thought it their own to till. The myth of the Clearances is the one about landowners doing cotters, crofters farmers and fishermen a favour by goading them into the modern age. ‘Goading’ is my term. They talk of ushering. The Clearances it is argued, saw progress, from a clan system to a civilised, well organised society.

I see the term a lot in half-baked captions attached to photographs of abandoned villages in tourist journals, trotted out by unionists and anglophiles in debates, so goes the justification for what amounts to theft by stealth and a disregard for human life akin to ethnic cleansing.

The argument avers had farmers and crofters not been forced off their small holdings many might have died of starvation. There is some truth in that, but it’s self-serving truth from those who excuse barbarity and cruelty and call it progress.

The logic of what they are saying is obvious. Had Scots not been sent away to die on foreign battlefields for England’s glory, or on over-stuffed immigration ships, or early deaths in Glasgow hovels, they would have died left on the land. This is a lie.

In reality, many European states and small provinces existed as rural societies, often relying on barter in order for people to gain the things they could not fashion or grow for themselves. In time, without any intrusion from another nation, they moved to a capitalist system of purchase while retaining a farming or socialist system to feed the nation and share its wealth. The capitalist aspect allowed the governing body to buy and import food stocks, or indeed, sell surplus to a neighbouring nation.

A harvest blighted

For those living off the land in Scotland, if the crop yield was low you could trade some of your cattle for grain to see you through the winter. What a cow was worth depended on the market value and the health of the beast. Cattle prices were not yours to control.

If you had no cattle you could offer your labour, or borrow from a friendly neighbour, assuming they had surplus to give. And if you had nothing of value to trade you could subdivide your land and trade that.

Back in the 1830’s and 40’s I can see why landlords were at first against subdivision of small holdings. It may be trite, but it’s reasonable to compare that transaction to renting an apartment which the tenant sub-lets without approval so he can pay the rent. Then again, proprietors were onto a good thing; the more subdivision that went on, the more labour you had at your disposal. Harvesting industries such as peat, wheat and kelp were labour intensive. That’s how it must have seemed to land owners in Skye, Barra, and Loch Broom where kelping demanded a lot of labour, a strip of land and a but ‘n ben, the trade for your work. However, this underhand policy has an accumulative counter effect which I’ll come to shortly.

Life lived on the edge

As a tenant your security was in permanent jeopardy. The more you gave away, the less you had to barter. No one paid you wages in money or grain.

In a previous essay on the Act of Union I mentioned two bad harvests that most likely weakened the populace’s resolve to withstand endless and sustained economic attacks from England. The English parliament exploited the situation. It needed to subdue Scotland to concentrate on war with France.

In 1836 there was a similar fall in crop yield, potato and oats. The deficiency in crops was under half the expected yield. Now, this is where we have to remember Scotland was ruled from Westminster, and in Victorian times. England was the most powerful nation on Earth, unaccountably wealthy. Just like today, in almost every political issue you can think of, Scotland had too few MPs to win a vote that could direct finance to help Highland and Lowland crofters.

When English nationalists try to silence implying Scotland is ungrateful for their beneficence, we ‘prospered’ from the British Empire same as them, they omit detail. People can count; a tenth of MPs at Westminster does not constitute a balance of power. That the dice was loaded, and loaded still, is not a reason to dissolve the exploitative Union, argue British nationalists. This reasoning doesn’t attain reality.

Send a scout

The British parliament has a classic method of ameliorating public concern by doing nothing. It sets up a commission to ‘look into the matter’. Westminster decided to show how much it ‘cared’ by sending an emissary to the western Highlands, Robert Grahame, an advocate of social medicine. Social medicine is distinct from the prescriptive service a general practitioner dispenses. It aims to assess a group’s environmental circumstances and any barriers to healthy living by seeking out what is causing the hardship, suggesting ways to remodel habits. (There is a Robert Graham Policy Centre – spelled without the ‘e’ – near Chicago dedicated to this sort of study.)

Off went Grahame to the Highlands in carriage and on horseback to study the locals at close quarter and report back to the Treasury, facts and figures in a bound journal. According to records, he calculated there was just over 100,000 people subsisting in the worst poverty-stricken areas at risk of starvation. The Outer Hebrides and Skye were hit the worst, Ross-shire and Sutherland less so. Cottars (farm laborers) appeared to be the most vulnerable, but so too were many tenant farmers.

What Grahame reported was something of a surprise. Though crop failure was a factor in the deprivation he encountered, the biggest agent of suffering and death was too many people sharing too small areas of arable land.

“The population of this part of the country [he meant Britain not Scotland] has been allowed to increase in much greater ratio than the means of subsistence which it affords.” [Note use of ‘allowed’.]

The poor are poor because they are poor

The answer was simple. Move people off the land. The clan system had been attacked left right and centre by English strategy and laws yet the majority of people held onto the land they and their forefathers had tilled rather than flee to the unknown. And why not? They were Gaels or Scots and had put their backs into it. Every rock moved to carve out a straight drill carried with it voices of their ancestor’s toil. Life is precarious if you cannot save anything from your toil for the bad times. There is nothing left to sell. Malnutrition stares you in the face. The Irish know how the rest of that story goes.

Outside charities, you were on your own. With starvation rife in the Highlands, the time it took to gather evidence and report back to London, left the destitute to suffer and die. It was stay and starve or emigrate. And if you were too underfed to work, the landlords would repossess your strip of ground and the house you lived in. The wealthiest nation in the world did not arrest the decay of the Highlands. So much for sharing in the ‘riches of the empire’.

Of course, there is a silver lining to mass poverty – war, and that’s exactly what England embarked upon for the next decade and more, strong men and boys rounded up, you might say ‘harvested’. Highland soldiers the first to be sent into battle, Lowlanders to follow. There was an empire to subjugate. As a soldier you get to hold down a square meal if you manage to avoid a bayonet in the belly. Pick up that Union Jack, sir, your loyalty is to the Crown not your family.

With Scotland denuded of its men all but the old and infirm, the harvest of menfolk dried up. After the Battle of Waterloo the remnants of regiments were stripped of their kilts and tartan badges because they could not be filled by true men of Scotland.

Meanwhile, back home, disaster capitalists were everywhere. Wife and children and the old were cleared off the land to make way for sheep, thousands of them, absent husbands unable to intervene. The protection of the clan system gone, families split up, all dignity, lost, told emigration was the way to prosperity, they were given a few bawbees and herded to the harbours to board the ships on which many never survived the journey.

There’s a fearful repetition to history when you’re not in control of your own country.


This entry was posted in Scottish Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Harvesting Scotland

  1. Great piece. History that all in Scotland should be made aware of. Worth sharing. (But in need of a little proof reading.)

  2. JSM says:

    Reblogged this on Ramblings of a 50+ Female and commented:
    What we never got taught in school.

  3. Marconatrix says:

    History unknown tends to become History Repeated …

  4. Might I draw people’s attention to Michael Newton’s landmark dual-language compendium of primary-source material from Gaelic émigrés in Canada –

    ‘Seanchaidh na Coille/ Memory-Keeper of the Forest: Anthology of Scottish Gaelic Literature of Canada’, Edited by Michael Newton, Cape Breton University Press, Sydney, Nova Scotia, 2015.

    “[R]ecent research has revealed that Scottish Gaelic was the third-most spoken European language at the time of (Canadian) Confederation. […] The British Empire’s ability to expand the territories under its control from 1756 to 1815 owed much to the fact that it spent from 75 per cent to 85 per cent of its budget on military enterprises. Landowners sought to tap these vast financial resources and enhance their own social rank by selling their Highland tenantry as natural-born soldiers who could be recruited in large numbers by leveraging their hereditary clan relationships. Highlanders of many social ranks seemed to believe that they could gain favour with the London government and dispel any lingering suspicions of Jacobite sympathies by a conspicuous demonstration of their loyalty in military service. Thus, the economic-political interests of the land-owning elite and the military ambitions of the empire conspired in the Highlands’ specialization in military recruitment, a specialization justified by recourse to obsolete and ethnocentric myths about supposed Gaelic ‘savagery’. In 1756 the young chieftain Simon Fraser of Lovat—son of an executed Jacobite ‘rebel’—successfully petitioned to raise a regiment to fight against French forces in North America and within two months about 2,000 Highlanders were mobilized for action. Some 12,000 Highland soldiers in total were involved by the end of the Seven Years’ War in other regiments as well. Gaels perceived themselves to have proved their mettle and their loyalties prominently by their efforts, not least on the Plains of Abraham. […] Soldiers and sailors who had fought in the North American theatre of the Seven Years’ War (1756-1763) were eligible for land grants in British North America as rewards for their military service.”

    Fuller review here:
    – – –
    Also, regarding the Irish Famine, the film “Black ‘47” is worth watching. The following review from a historian perspective gives qualified approval –


  5. diabloandco says:

    The new clearances terrify me and it is imperative that we break away from the elite control of Westminster and their pals.
    Depressed , suppressed , repressed and oppressed.

  6. Grouse Beater says:

    I have to admit, matters are getting fraught.

  7. Like the piece but the photo is of an Irish eviction in Gweedore,Co Donegal from the Lawrence Collection held at the National Library of Ireland.

  8. Grouse Beater says:

    Aye, I have a few Irish ones. (Ireland made a series of three filmed dramas on their Clearances for television.) The few existing of Scots I’ve used before, and I didn’t want to return to the familiar Victorian paintings. In any event, I touch on the Irish experience, and I see a Fearghas mentions Black 47 which I reviewed last year. The rest of the photographs of Scots villages are modern, foundations of houses, and a few standing walls.

  9. My apologies to Grousebeater. I did not realize he had already posted an excellent review of ‘Black 47’ –


    Apparently ‘Black 47’ is based on an earlier short film (10 min) in Irish (with English subtitles), called ‘An Ranger’. Different actors of course. And the main Connaught Ranger character returning to his devastated home is wearing the red uniform of a British soldier –

    I was reading somewhere today the stunning fact that in 1840 there were eight million people in Ireland, at least half of whom were Irish speakers. By 1900 the population of the island of Ireland had dropped to four million, of whom only about fifteen per cent were speakers of Irish.

  10. Grouse Beater says:

    Your last paragraph on Ireland’s population is a classic method of subjugating antagonist countries an imperial power wishes to control. You crush popular dissent by harsh policies, starvation, force mass immigration, or if those things fail, military intervention. We are still doing that to nations only now we don’t want their refugees settling in Britain.

  11. Grouse Beater says:

    ‘Black 47’ was inspired by that short.

  12. I have located the source of my above-stated Irish population statistics related to the famine. It was from near the end of the following article –


    Actual quote is –

    “It has been calculated that at least 1 million people, or about 12-15% of the population died, mostly from disease, during the famine, the dead being overwhelmingly from the rural poor. […] The famine caused mass migration, as about 1.5 million people fled the country, mostly to north America. This mass migration, which continued throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries, triggered a permanent demographic decline in the Irish population, which fell from about 8 million in 1840 to about 4 million in 1900. It also constituted the fatal blow to the Irish language, spoken by up to half the population before the famine but only 15% by 1900. [Footnote: About 620,000 Irish speakers were recorded in the 1901 census out of a population of about 4.3 million.]”

  13. Derick Tulloch says:

    See the photo of Garth, which is, or was, in the shadow of Fitful Head

    Pre-Clearance the island of Fetlar held 800 people. The current population is 61

  14. Douglas McGregor says:

    We really need to harness the power of the Scottish diaspora more effectively , Ireland does it to great effect. The loss of so many young ,fit and able people to England and the empire for two centuries has left Scotland with a distinct shortage of confidence , even the SNP seem weak.

  15. Grouse Beater says:

    I retweeted the photos on Twitter. Did not know there was a place called Garth. (My American name.) Thank you.

  16. Grouse Beater says:

    I agree. I look with envy at Ireland’s national presence in the states. Salmond got things moving, but we should be doing a lot more.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s