The Great Wall – a review


Matt Damon does his best to blend in with some fetching outfits

The Chinese invented paper, printing – block and moveable type, porcelain ceramics, lacquer, silk cloth, seed drills, iron ploughs, rice terraces, land cultivation, agriculture, fireworks, gunpowder, cannon, rockets, and military precision, the list is almost endless, but they needed Matt Damon to help them defeat thousands of murderous mythological beasts. No one else had the wit to figure out a plan, not even Confucius, though I’m sure he foresaw the coming of a pale rider.

The Great Wall is The Man Who Would Be King produced by Hollywood for the Chinese market. With a tonnage of talent aboard we get is a video game with a million monsters and some real actors. The by-line should be, (cue deep, gravelly voice-over) “How many beasts can a man kill with only one quiver of arrows, one sword, and a pony tail?”

I can imagine the boardroom scene.

STUDIO BOSS: We’ve been bought out by China’s top theatre group. Now what?              STUDIO EXEC: Yeah, and first picture they want, gotta be set in China.                            STUDIO BOSS: Tall order. We’ve got diddly-squat scripts set in China.                                STUDIO EXEC: How about a couple of mercenaries fighting wolf packs?                  STUDIO BOSS: So? What’s that got to do with commies?

(Junior executives shuffle their files, avoid eye contact, lost for ideas.)

STUDIO EXEC: So … we switch it to two soldiers in China fighting for the Emperor. STUDIO BOSS: Hmm. Got legs. The language barrier, how do we deal with it?                 STUDIO EXEC: We hire director, Zhang Yimou. He’s done big cast movies.                       STUDIO BOSS: Terrific. Matt Damon owes us a picture. Lean on him.                          STUDIO EXEC:  Yes, sir. And I can get Pedro Pascal for the European market.                 STUDIO ACCOUNTANT:  (Worried) Big cast budget, could exceed $150 million.      STUDIO BOSS: It’s only goddam money. Shoot it!

The Great Wall is Matt Damon’s first foray into China, Zhang Yimou’s first English-language production, and the first film to come out of Legendary Pictures’ continent-hopping strategy, a production company bought by the Wanda Group of Chinese cinemas. The result is a whopping disappointment; in a nutshell: a hundred and one things to do on the Great Wall of China.

Sure, it’s engrossing, and everybody wears fantastic Italian fashion house designed body armour in matching colours, but it’s seriously tired fare, with a script a first year pupil could have written during his lunch break. There are half-a-dozen identifiable characters given lines – subtitled – one Chinese who speaks perfect English, with Damon and Pascal wearing dusty old leather jackets. Damon’s accent runs from Suffolk to Jersey to Californian and back again. He struggles with his dialogue, anachronistically peppered with modern vocabulary. One guy gets to say “bitch”. There’s some clunky humour, and bromanctic quips between himself, Pascal, and a completely lost Willem Dafoe held captured as the novelty westerner for twenty-five years.

They’ve travelled from Europe to China to bring home ‘black powder’, a magical explosive concoction they’ve heard about, better known as gun powder. Printing didn’t reach  Europe for 300 or more years yet the duo could have made heroes, fixed in the history books, for ‘inventing’ printing, instead our boys chose to bring home a sack of the crash-bang, wallop stuff.

How did this sappy epic get the green light? Money. Official co-productions are entitled to better revenue-sharing terms than imported films usually receive in China, 43 percent of after-tax ticket sales, instead of the usual 25 per cent, but there are onerous conditions attached. In exchange, they must feature large numbers of Chinese cast, employ high-level Chinese production crew, shoot in the country and tell a story involving Chinese cultural elements.

Given that North America and China are the largest movie distribution territories in the world, there are gargantuan profits to be made, but studios have found it daunting to meet the demands, while telling a story that straddles disparate cultures. The Great Wall fails at the starting gate.


Are you going to fire that thing or not? Well, are you?

Still, Damon has certainly lent the whole enterprise a certain class, and his presence, alongside Willem Dafoe and Chinese A-listers Andy Lau and Zhang Hanyu, should propel the film to box office success in China. For the international market, however, the film is best positioned as a novelty for monster-flick fanboys.

Using computer-generated images of the Great Wall, the film begins with short on-screen texts explaining that, as the wall enters its third millennium in existence, there are both facts and legends about it. “This is one of the legends,” the text reads, defending itself from the avalanche of  detractors throwing eggs at the stupid premise to follow.

The protagonist here is one William Garin, (Damon), who, while fleeing from the “hill tribes” in northern China, gets himself and his fellow mercenary Tovar, (Pedro Pascal of Game of Thrones) captured by a military garrison at one of the main outposts along the Great Wall.

With their claim that they’re just traders easily debunked, the pair’s lives are spared when William proffers a giant paw he chopped off from a beast that attacked him in the Steppes. His Chinese captors realise the  advance of the devouring beasts is upon them early, something that happens every sixty years – a completely arbitrary number – and could wipe out all Chinese civilisation and beyond. That’s is why the Chinese built the great wall, but no one twigs they would have been eaten at any time while building it.


The Emperor as young boy – Bertolucci eat yer heart out

The monster, they are then told, is a Taotie – yes, I had to look up this drivel in IMDB to check my facts – a deadly lizard-like paranormal species.

Having saved a soldier in the battle and showcased his archery skills, William is welcomed into the life of the garrison. That was easy the easy bit. Now for the food and the wenching.

But this is a film for the Chinese market, so strict codes of conduct are enforced. People who lust after each other can only smile longingly. Initially bent on getting what he wants, his conscience is soon awakened, (this is Matt Damon, after all), and his head turned by Lin (Jing Tian), the only female English-speaking commander at the outpost, and not a single instance of sexual harassment or wolf whistle.

It’s hardly a surprise that William chooses to stay, not that you are cheering for him. And while the “Westerners” are regularly shown up by the principled Chinese warriors, it’s hardly a surprise who eventually gets to save the day for China and all mankind.


Damon on set looking bored, and Yimou looking for the exit

There’s also a moral message, which I forget, something about trust, anyhow, the banality of this moral is representative of the weightlessness of nearly every aspect of the plot, the staging and the action sequences.

I haven’t touched on the sheer lack of logic in the film: Why do the Taoties only attack humans every 60 years? Why does the army host a “crane corps,” involving female soldiers bungee-jumping down the wall to lance the beasts, when there are cannons and other artillery? Why does no one sleep? Why is William not called Jason Bourne?

Then again, Zhang Yimou might have delivered exactly what was asked of him, a no-nonsense visual spectacle that stops at nothing in its portrayal of an imaginary, mysterious ancient culture. I’ll give it the benefit of the doubt and conjecture they decided to make it as a starter, and then concentrate on something better with more time to think about it. It’s new terrain, so one step at a time, lads. But it’s no creative breakthrough.

Damon has come in for a lot of stick for choosing a role as an American lead in a Chinese film, but he’s weathered the storm of criticism. He argues his character “was always intended to be European,” and emphasizes the collaborative nature of the project,  planned to fuse Hollywood and Chinese star power. “That whole idea of whitewashing, I take that very seriously,” he said, during a press conference in Beijing.

Remember this is a movie made by Zhang Yimou, a master directors, one-time lover of the mesmerising Gong Li, scourge of the dead hand of Chinese bureaucracy, maker of visually exciting, wondrous epics such as Red Sorghum, (1987) Raise the Red Lantern, (1991) and House of Flying Daggers, (2004).

It ought to be a sure fire winner, but for all its whistling arrows, zinging spears, and fiery explosions it’s a damp squib. Beyond the casting and the ceaseless onslaught of diverse special effects, Zhang and his Hollywood screenwriters have delivered nothing more than a formulaic monster movie.

Sheesh! Enough with the Terracotta warriors and  JK Rowling silly nonsense!

For a blockbuster epic it’s epically uninteresting.

  • Star rating: Two-and-half
  • Cast: Matt Damon, Jing Tian, Pedro Pascal, Willem Dafoe
  • Director:  Zhang Yimou
  • Screenplay: Carlo Bernard, Doug Miro, Tony Gilroy
  • Cinematography: Stuart Dryburgh, Zhao Xiaoding
  • Music: Ramin Djawadi
  • Duration: 103 minutes
  • 5 plus: potential classic, innovative. 5: outstanding. 4: excellent. 3.5: excellent but flawed. 3: very good if formulaic. 2: straight to DVD. 1: crap; why did they bother?

This entry was posted in Film review. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to The Great Wall – a review

  1. Well, if you’ve done one thing with this review, you’ve whetted my appetite for PROPER Chinese cinema with a few helpful recommendations there too.
    I might take in Japan along the way…

  2. Grouse Beater says:

    Ha ha!
    Yes, better than an east-west pudding. Yamou’s other films are tremendous.

  3. diabloandco says:

    Jings! That’s two films you have reviewed recently that I can strike off my lists of ‘Ooh! That might be good”.
    You save me lots of money you know.

  4. Grouse Beater says:

    Glad to be of service. 🙂

    The Great Wall is a film to go to see on a dreich day, when you need the week’s anxieties washed out of your head.

  5. Conan the Librarian says:

    Um… sorry, a pedant like me canon not let that pass. Boom-Boom.

  6. Grouse Beater says:

    Hi Conan – You’re thinking of the theological kind, a common error. 🙂

  7. Davy says:

    For a totally, leave your brain at home – spectacular bang crash wallop – cut the head afa the nearest monster wee a big axe – big screen mash up with really cool uniforms, this was the film for me and my 13 year old son with two hotdogs a large popcorn/bag sweeties and a couple monster size cokes.

    Well the wife was working and we men didn’t want to waste the free Saturday afternoon improving our intellect.

  8. Grouse Beater says:

    Fair enough. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s