The Tartan Elephant

884.jpg

Scotland is North England but with a different name for reasons of tourism

A colloquial cliché

There’s an idiom become fashionable in daily conversation. Considering the mammal is destined to be wiped out it by ivory poachers, there were literally and figuratively herds of them everywhere. The phrase is … ‘the elephant in the room’. If you wanted to sound smart you dropped the phrase into a debate, the big issue nobody dare discuss.

Scotland voted by a large majority to stay in Europe. England voted out. How do UK parliamentarians deal with the will of the Scottish people? As they have always done – patronise it, reject it, ignore it. Theresa May crowed “The days are over when the UK and the US intervene in the sovereignty of other countries”. Scots everywhere can allow themselves a wry smile. They know the elephant in the room is independence.

Meanwhile, the United Kingdom’s Supreme Court ruled the UK parliament must debate and vote on the efficacy of leaving the European Union. The Supreme Court ruling did two things: it reminded Scotland that any English judge with a wig on his head, straight seams in his tights, and a bottle of Scotch under his desk, can usurp Scottish Law in direct contravention of the Act of Union and Treaty.

Secondly, it completely wiped out the dubious unionist claim Scotland’s few political powers constitute authority incarnate, ever-lasting, irrevocable. They have as much value as Scottish £5 note tendered at a BNP rally.

887

The Scots influence on the world has even reached the plains of the Serengeti

How did Scotland arrive at where it is now?

The Scottish branch of the Labour Party moved Scotland to where it is today. As their every utterance  grew indistinct from Tory ideology the SNP grew in popularity, a clear alternative to old school career politics.

It was Union Jack McConnell’s administration that abandoned the first-past-the-post in local elections to introduce proportional representation. The door was opened. Districts once diehard Labour strongholds saw new talent appearing on the electoral register, people who wanted Scotland’s voice to be heard.

McConnell’s political error freed a new democratic spirit at grass roots level. Catholics loyal to the Labour party, who wanted a good degree of self-governance suddenly found themselves among like-minds their hopes open to discussion, Labour shibboleths challenged. They saw the SNP as classless, all-encompassing that fitted their ideals.

Moreover, the SNP had a group of politicians every inch the match of Labour and Tory grandees: Alex Salmond, John Swinney, Michael Russell, Nicola Sturgeon, Angus Robertson, John Nicolson, and others, the Donald Dewers of their day but without the compromising attitude to sovereignty. The new generation of SNP politicians knew their Scottish history thoroughly, and they identified the democratic omissions that Labour had been happy to ignore for generations. What is more, they could articulate solutions. The public took note.

Within a few years the Labour group had gone through a pack of leaders in a frenzy to better the SNP’s habit of presenting the electorate with candidates of ability. Labour’s band were not fit for the job, and all strangely unable to communicate intelligence.

Labour began denouncing its own constituency. Hacks talked of the “something for nothing” society, treating the notion of state assistance fit only for condemnation. Back in the day state help was a right not a privilege. Scots did not take kindly described as welfare scroungers.

700

The café birthplace of Rowling’s Potter, the SNP a huge elephant in her house

SNP very bad because its so good

In retaliation, an unimaginative Labour group threw all their energies into portraying the SNP as a semi-evil cabal of plotters in the vein of Guy Fawkes, willing to blow up the United Kingdom for a single ideal. Labour fell back on empty slogans and jeering.

Labour’s dearth of progressive ideas reached its zenith when McConnell’s administration returned £1.3 billion of funds to the UK Treasury, every penny earned by Scotland, on the basis he could find nothing to spend it on. It was an astonishingly stupid thing to do and smacked of a minor official ingratiating himself with his employers. Labour it had been in power over thirty years and had done nothing, absolutely nothing to mitigate Scotland’s social ills, nor the Tories before them.

The SNP took over administration as a minority party, and did so with tremendous gusto and efficiency much to voter’s approval, critics tried to avoid talking of SNP delivering the end of bridge tolls, a freeze on council tax, and phasing out of prescription charges.

In any event, the Holyrood Parliament had never been constructed to tackle those profound ills. That was Westminster’s job. The populace looked at the SNP and saw a breath of fresh air and good governance, compared to old guard conformity and mediocrity.

Carpet bombing no Dyson could hoover up

Throughout the Referendum on Independence Scotland sustained a bombardment of derision, a firestorm of black propaganda. Carpet bombing the natives didn’t work in Vietnam, but hell, it might work in Scotland.

It came from all sections of the British establishment, the entire English and Scottish press and media. Puerile stand-up comics took a stab at belittling Scottish mores with nothing more than a few nutritional jokes and a very bad stage-Scots accent.

The BBC, the state broadcaster, offered itself as the natural platform of truthiness to a raggle-taggle, scurrilous ‘Better Together’ campaign that relied heavily on scaring the populace, young and old, with fabricated ‘facts’ and dire warnings of doom.

On first sight it was an odd assembly of bedfellows, but in reality they had a great deal in common. Labour the traditional enemy of Tory rule now glad-handed their political opponents giving the electorate the evidence they needed to validate their suspicion the old parties were a mirror images of each other. You could not tell them apart.

Votes for Tory and labour Party collapsed.

995

Scotland’s leader of the few Tory group told the Scottish electorate Heaven is on Earth so long as they vote to stay in Hell. She now counsels Hell is Heaven

Don’t shoot until you see the whites of their eyes

The independence referendum lost, the SNP didn’t turn in on itself squabbling and bickering. It maintained its stance, looking like a great champion dignified in defeat who might return for a rematch once his wounds healed.

Membership shot up from around 28,000 to over 130,000 in the space of a few months. The people of Scotland were determined their just demands would not be swept into the gutter like discarded fag ends in George Square the day after the plebiscite vote.

The leading figure of Scotland’s renaissance, Alex Salmond, resigned as First Minster but did not fade into obscurity. He rose like Lazarus and got elected again as a Westminster MP reinvigorated, ready to harass the wannabee Churchills, such was his enduring popularity. His enemies retired, lost their political posts, or worse, were elected to the House of Lords confirming their hypocrisy to  alert voters. Salmond’s redoubtable colleague, Nicola Surgeon, took his place as First Minister, and proved to be more popular than Amazon’s Game of Thrones.

Enemies of democracy thought eradicating the SNP would cleanse Scotland of rebellion.

The damn Scots think Scotland belongs to them

With only 32% of England’s electorate backing them, Tories took power at Westminster. They began rolling back decades of progressive policies to impose more neo-liberal dogma. The worst scenario predicted by the SNP came to pass.

Prime Minister David Cameron, fresh from winning the Scottish Referendum by a small margin of anglophiles, the Queen still ‘purring’ in his ear, immediately proclaimed English laws for English votes, letting the Scots know they may have been induced to stay in the UK but they’re not entitled to the full English breakfast.

Balls high, Cameron laid down a Bill for a Referendum on membership of the European Union. He thought to silence his own backbench whiners who believed only Etonians are humans fit for governance. Scotland wanted to join the international world on its own terms,  England wanted to exclude the international world on its own terms.

To the nation’s shock Cameron lost the EU Referendum, resigned, and the unelected Theresa May, an ordinary politician of no discernible ability, slipped into number 10 Downing Street as UK prime minister.

She wore an off-the-peg tartan trouser suit for the occasion, an urban icon created by clothes designer Vivienne Westwood. Unlucky for May and posterity’s indelible images, Westwood is a passionate advocate of Scottish independence.

Cat 5.png

Theresa May arrives at Washington Airport to meet Donald Trump. Presumably on her return she will wave a letter in the air to proclaim “Deal in our time!”

History repeats itself

When it comes to Scotland’s democratic rights England’s parliament has only two modes, indifference or riding roughshod over Scotland’s interests. It was so in the late 1600s and the same today. As in 1707, Scotland makes plain it prefers good relations with European nations, England does not. With some minor reservations Scotland voted overwhelmingly in the Brexit referendum to remain partners with Europe, as did 98% of loyal Brit Gibraltarians also ignored by the harbingers of British national chauvinism.

Theresa May promised that Scotland would be consulted on the new world order, which is the same as the old world order but without the protection of human rights. She lied. To English supremacists, cooperation is for frogs, wops, tulip chasers, Pollacks, and onion Johnnies. It was a promise that was never going to be honoured.

The distant rumble isn’t thunder, it’s an elephant stampede

To Scotland’s eyes the Tory Party in London is intolerant of other cultures. The British Labour Party is unable to stand up straight and support its leader, Jeremy Corbyn.  Liberal Democrats pretend they are a political party while sounding like a boy scout troupe lost without a compass. Ukip has fallen apart, its former leader Nigel Farage become everything he detests, an economic migrant. But the racism that lies in the heart of English xenophobia won’t be curbed. It will grow and grow.

Unique in its history, Scotland holds in its hands the fate of its sister nations. The pachyderm in the Unionist room is no domesticated Indian elephant. It’s a very large angry tartan mammoth getting tetchier by the minute continually fed dry peanuts.

***************************************

This entry was posted in Scottish Independence Referendum, Scottish Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to The Tartan Elephant

  1. Alex Wright says:

    An excellent summary of the past and the present. Much appreciated.

  2. Grouse Beater says:

    Thanks, Alex. I’m unsure if others will agree with my conclusion, but that’s how I see the accumulation of events. Scotland’s decision will determine their fate and our future.

  3. Les55 says:

    Excellent summary

  4. Grouse Beater says:

    🙂 Readers like the occasional history essay, something of a surprise to me, so I think I might go back to my notes on the Darien Venture (oft called erroneously the ‘Damian Scheme) and harvest failure and see if there’s anything worth imparting there. (Anythin’, but listen to Trump and May sookin’ up tae each ither!)

  5. Thanks for this measured piece, GB.

    Yes we were ‘carpetbombed’ by the Brit Establishment, yet came within touching distance.

    I recall Mags Curran, whose whining drivel must have been worth 10,000 Yes converts alone, complaining that she didn’t want to be a ‘foreigner’ if she needed medical treatment while in England. Nonsense of course within the EU then, and even more risible now in light of the news from England this week that if you are obese, a smoker, or elderly in need of a hip or knee replacement, but can still hobble about in agony, Health Boards are scraping your operations or treatment, as an ‘efficiency saving’, ie., because of Tory Dogma cuts in public spending you are ‘the undeserving ill’.

    May will be right at home with Locker Room Trump who is scrapping Obamacare as they hold hands and leer at the camera. It won’t be Viet Nam carpetbombing by our media and the Red Blue and Yellow Tories next time. It will be Full Metal Union Jacket.

    During the Quebec 2 independence campaign, the Canadian Government commissioned Canadian airlines to fly pro Union Canadians into Montreal for mass Unionist rallies, and mounted the Mother of All Project Fears. Banks and businesses would leave, et cetera et cetera.

    We need only hunker down in the trenches for a few months until B Day 31st March. Trump and May are doing so much work for us. When the Brexshit hits the fan, Better Together will sound like the philosophy of a madman.
    We will do it next time.

  6. diabloandco says:

    ‘Better Together will sound like the philosophy of a madman’ God , I hope you are right .

    Grouse , the tartan and tweed pachyderms are fab!

  7. Grouse Beater says:

    Must admit I’ve done little homework on the Quebec issue, other than read their warnings to the SNP on how to beat brutal propaganda and tactics. (That’s the practical Scot in me.) But learning the Canadian government bussed in its supporters seems to fit the pattern of administrations that elect Public Enemy No1 the public! I wonder if Trudeau Junior would exploit the same methods in a Quebec rerun.

  8. MacMina MacAllan says:

    I have rather neglected inde blogs since the Scottish referendum but now with prospects of Inderef2 I have been resurrecting the old reading list.

    I have thoroughly enjoyed catching up with all your back numbers and very glad you are keeping the faith and still producing your excellent articles.

    Lang may yer lum reek.

  9. Grouse Beater says:

    Often I wonder who it is reading one essay at a time in a day – the statistics only show the number of readers set against published work, not actual names. Glad to have you back, re-energised and ready to fight for your civil rights! And my hoos lum is reekin’ logs at the moment.

  10. I’d love a re-run of the rickshaw ‘Bow Down To Your Imperial Masters’ farce.
    Do you think 100 MP’s would travel to Glasgow with their holdalls and laptops this time? Doubt it.

  11. Grouse Beater says:

    For me, the ‘Imperial Masters’ intervention was one of the great highlights of the Referendum debate. How will historians express it in their analysis of a nation’s ambitions.

  12. eva comrie says:

    Excellent – thank you!

  13. Grouse Beater says:

    You’re welcome. 🙂

  14. Mima Foreman says:

    Very well put.

  15. carthannas says:

    Thanks a lot. I really found this informative and enjoyed reading it. Look forward to the piece on the Darien Venture!

  16. carthannas says:

    Can you direct me to where I might read these warnings. Thanks

  17. Grouse Beater says:

    Hello, Carthanass

    Warnings came many and direct from Canadian individuals during the great debate in the run up to the Referendum for self-governance, usually in newspaper articles, and blogs written by key figures in the Quebec Liberation movement.

    There was constant advice on how to watch out for and handle scaremongering, the Right-wing antagonist press, false calls to patriotism, and the dismissing of civil rights.

    Also there was lots of anecdotal evidence about how Canadian government officials skewed facts and figures to create doubt in the mind of secessionists. (Scotland isn’t a secessionist nation in the same sense because our independence aims to keep the Union of the Crowns.) Unionists did and are still doing their damned best to portray the demand for real democracy as separatism, meaning isolationism, exactly the opposite of self-determination.

    You could try dropping key Canadian and Quebec words and phrases in Google and see what comes out.

    The House of Lords held an inquiry on how independence regained could-maybe might affect the constitution – England has none, it’s all scattered among laws and bills giving constitutional lawyers a good living for life!

    Here is the document: http://www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-committees/constitution/Scottish%20independence/Scottish-Independence-evidence-volume-24-April.pdf

  18. carthannas says:

    Thanks for the reply above

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s