Scotland and Happiness


I believe in the pursuit of happiness.

I believe every individual has a right to happiness.

When all the senses are engaged, excitement, risk, intellect, participation, happiness is a kind of intoxication. For most of us the essentials of happiness are food, drink, and a roof over our heads. Some require the addition of children to reach a desired level of happiness.

Poor or wealthy, if a nation controls its own destiny it has the best chance of achieving happiness for its citizens. Scotland’s plebiscite hopes to secure exactly that through the democratically ages-established tradition of empowerment of the individual.

At the moment indigenous Scots feel decisions are things people make elsewhere. Our own government discovered that on inception, devolution  shallow and limited, and to prove it Westminster called our parliament nothing more than a council parish. Since when do you give a friend a gift and then boast you got it cheap because it doesn’t work?

Who says Scotland is too small, too poor to govern itself?

Greenland is the world’s largest island but a very small nation.

It has its own tribes, history, culture, art, topography, environment, and administration. After hundreds and more years ruled by Norway and then Denmark it achieved its ambition to become a self-governing nation. It retains Denmark’s Royal family and Denmark’s monetary policy to some extent.

With a tiny annual GNP a mere 1.3 billion, Greenland is not wealthy by any stretch of the imagination yet, by all accounts, somehow its 56,000 souls lead generally happy lives. They are as happy as circumstances permit.

Achieving harmony

Achieving any kind of social harmony is difficult if not impossible when the individual feels isolated, or separated from determining the things that matter in daily life.

Unionists warn Scotland of isolation as if our two nations with all our generations of inter-marriages, multifarious institutions, and trade could ever physically separate socially and geographically. Well, Greenland can be described accurately as isolated, extremely isolated, particularly in its winter months, yet the people of Greenland are in control of their lives in large measure. They are empowered.

Greenlanders do not think they need to be micro-managed by a larger nation, or  consider the acquisition of material wealth of paramount importance, given in response to cap-in-hand pleas, or by ingratiation. They are not freeloaders. They have an in-built sense of their own worth. On-going, open participation in everything is everything to them, and they are a small enough society to achieve that as a matter of course.

The herd instinct

One of the strongest instincts of human nature is the herd instinct, affinity with a group. Greenlanders have it in abundance. They are so confident in themselves that they readily embrace other races not indigenous, such as Americans and their aircraft base! – a source of income until Greenlanders decide otherwise.

People in Scotland have an in-built problem in that regard. If honest, the vast majority of us want to run our nation’s affairs, and to a limited extent we do, but we do it under supervision, ultimately governed by the government and Treasury of the United Kingdom – Westminster, and usually by an iron fist. (Refusing us a share of our own pound sterling is rule by bully.) Westminster gives a pretence of consultation.

The all-encompassing United Kingdom subverts rational choice by the simple expedient of England, the dominant nation, distributing power and wealth unequally. It feathers its own nest. The media is its propaganda tool. Here today, gone tomorrow selected powers for Scotland are of no worth. They can be weakened or removed at a moment’s notice. Collecting our taxes, VAT and all, and then tossing an allowance at us, is usury by landlord. We rent our own country.

To mean anything significant power over decisions must be invested in the people – sovereign, immutable.

One doctrine fits all

The unspoken principle is, the United Kingdom contains all the qualities required to attain happiness, therefore Scotland need only identify with those expectations, with England’s best interests, values, policies, culture, and its personal variety of colonial democracy.

This might have an attraction were it not that adopting the ethics and motives of a dominant nation creates an ersatz kind of domestic continuity.

Worse, it removes responsibility from individuals. It stops the search for alternative, better societies and social structures. We become mere ciphers to the greater nation’s goals, goals we don’t necessarily share.

Buying and possessing material things isn’t happiness

By free markets we are told what we can choose, so be content. This is a falsehood.

In reality the individual loses choice living under the vagaries of unregulated markets. Power and therefore choice currently lies exclusively in the hands of corporate tyrannies, in the ruling class and its elite, and in the media that they own and control. 

A nation in charge of its own destiny gives itself a good chance of throwing extreme capitalism off its back, debts and all. It can enact laws to govern behaviour that helps suppress our worst instincts, the venal and the avaricious. It can construct a fairer distribution of goods and wealth than a nation intent on keeping the best for itself.

What does an autonomous Scotland offer?

On the one hand, we can place Scotland’s hopes and aspirations in the hands of Scotland’s people. People power. On the other, we can choose to abandon hope in preference for the general good of the dominant nation, not for any specific, identifiable group of individuals in it, not for the poor, the disenfranchised, or the homeless, but for an abstract, intangible notion called “the United Kingdom.” Put another way, it’s called ‘Britishness’.

Unionist’s fear mongering, warning of financial destitution on the advent of autonomy, removes any will for the conquest of happiness. It is joyless creed. It warns there is nothing in self-governance for the individual, not even affection for your fellow man.  If that was true Westminster would dispense with power tomorrow.

Small is beautiful

The natural inclination of any homogenous society is to form and hold to its own ideals, to follow a moral language that is applicable to its people, to conduct itself by its own sense of values. It should be a place where one individual cares about another as a natural state of affairs, where the individual develops and prospers, one’s happiness bound up in the happiness of others. 

That’s what independence means to me – the profound knowledge we are in the real stream of life pursuing happiness and hope for others and, by reward, for our self.

That’s why I will always vote for Scotland’s self-determination.

This entry was posted in Scottish Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Scotland and Happiness

  1. diabloandco says:

    That was worth a re -visit – a very good pep talk for those of us mightily depressed by the media and their molls at Westminster . Or is it the other way round MPs with their molls in the media ?
    Or are they just so easily interchangeable?

  2. twathater says:

    I share your beliefs and sentiments GB, but unfortunately the Scottish people appear to have a reticence of their own self worth , which is maybe not surprising after decades of sending despicable self serving corrupt individuals to represent the Scottish people, who in turn joined the merry fray and castigated, undermined and denigrated the very people they were meant to serve.

    They are still attempting to do it today, fortunately many sites like your own and others are exposing these unscrupulous groups and individuals, and are also combating the blatant lies , obfuscation and deliberate misinformation uttered ad infinitum .

    Instead of instilling a belief that proud Scots have benefited the world throughout history far in excess of their supposed size, and that our resources and inventiveness are restrained and curtailed by our oppressive overlords.

    Let every TRUE Scotsman and Scotswoman throw off the shackles of, too wee too poor too stupid and show the world what an independent Scotland is capable of

  3. George Rosie says:

    Greenland has the highest suicide rate in the world peaking in the summer. It has ongoing problems with poverty and alcoholism. Let’s not be Greenland, eh

  4. Grouse Beater says:

    That ‘statistic’ has to be arrant nonsense. As high as the UK, as the USA? Greenland has so few citizens it would take only a generation for them to be wiped out by their own hand. LoL. And do really think Scotland has no problem with alcohol abuse or poverty?

  5. BCM says:

    Any chance of removing this post from the top? It’s in the way of newer articles. I thought the site was malfunctioning; I hadn’t seen a new post in months till I scrolled down a bit! Thanks.

  6. Grouse Beater says:

    That’s a mystery, BCM.
    On any recent essay the top should read ‘Paterson – a review’ and then all the previous articles as they were published listed below. But I can see on the general public scroll list it’s at the top. No idea how it got stuck there … will check…

  7. Grouse Beater says:

    An unwary stray click on the mouse must have done the deed. Hope that’s it fixed now.

  8. Amy says:

    These are actually enormous ideas in about blogging.
    You have touched some good points here. Any way keep up wrinting.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s